top of page
2. JUNK SCIENCE

Science done right is objective, it is rational, it is an aid for discovering the truth. However, there is a great deal of what is admitted into criminal court trials that is called "science" but that doesn't pass scientific muster. In 2009, the National Academy of Sciences wrote a scathing report criticizing most of the scientific evidence being used in criminal courts. Sadly, little has changed since than. Junk science was a contributing factor in 24% of all wrongful convictions. If you are falsely accused of a crime where science is being used, don't become a statistic. Learn from the mistakes of past wrongful conviction cases and combat the junk science. 

"MUCH FORENSIC EVIDENCE... IS INTRODUCED IN CRIMINAL TRIALS WITHOUT ANY MEANINGFUL SCIENTIFIC VALIDATION."

-NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
bottom of page